THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY LANGUAGE LEARNING METHOD TOWARD STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY AN EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH FOR EIGHT GRADE OF SMPN 3 BANJARBARU

Ridhani Fizi

Abstract


English speaking ability an experimental is one of the language skill which become the main purpose for the English language learner at the school. The purpose of CLLM is to help the students to communicate in their daily life, but the achievement of the CLLM is felt difficult practically, because in fact, many students are still passive in the classroom. When the students communicate in the target language, students might encounter a situation in which they cannot find words to convey meaning. When the flow of communication in this situation of communication breakdown, they used Community Language Learning Method (CLLM) method to prevent the stagnation in conveying that messages and make the students find it enjoyable to learn. Therefore, this study concerns with students’ ability in learning English by using CLLM.
This study is attempt to discover students’ speaking ability for the eight year students’ of SMPN 3 Banjarbaru in the school year 2023/2024. Two research questions formulated: (1) to what extent is the achievement of the speaking ability for the eight year students of SMPN 3 Banjarbaru in the school year 2023/2024? (2) to what extent is the effect of CLL toward students’ speaking ability for the eight year students of SMPN 3 Banjarbaru in the school year 2023/2024?
This study was experimental research. So there were two groups of sample, they were experimental and control groups. The population of this study was 160 students. The researcher took 40 students as the sample. As the research instruments which was developed to collect data, the researcher provided some pictures, the students were asked to describe the pictures. While the students were describing the pictures, the researcher recorded it.
After collecting and calculating the data, the researcher found that the mean score of pre-test and post-test for experiment group were 46.45 and 51.85, while for control group were 41.2 and 45.3. And in testing the hypothesis, the researcher used t-test formula. The researcher found that t-test was 2.280 and t-table in significant rank 0.05 (5%) was 2.021. It proved that t-test was higher than t-table (2.280 > 2.021). So the alternative hypothesis was accepted. It indicates that Community Language Learning Method (CLLM) was effective in speaking teaching for the eight year students of SMPN 3 Banjarbaru in the school year 2023/2024.

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Alwasilah, Chaedar, Furqanul Azies. 2002. Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif: Teori dan Praktik.

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi IV.

Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ary, Donald, 2002. Introduction to Research in Education. Sixth edition. USA: Wordsworth

Thomson Learning.

Cahyono, Bambang Yudi. 1997. Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Tekhnik, Strategi dan Hasil

Penelitian. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Djiwandono, M. Soenardi. 1996. Tes Bahasa Dalam Pengajaran. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 1998. Methodology Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.

Haryanto, Yan. 1994. Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1993. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Heaton, J. B. 1989. Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.

Hornby, AS. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford

University Press.

Keraf, Gorries. 1991. Tata Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Nusa Indah.

Kumar, Ranjit. 1993. Writing A Research Proposal. Western Australia: Curtin University of

Technology.

Mcllrath. D, and Hiutt, W. (1995). The Teaching-Learning Process: A Discussion of Models.

Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.

Munir, Ahmad. 2005. Communication Strategies Toward Students’ Speaking Ability. Selong

STKIP Hamzanwdi. Thesis S-1. Unpublished.

Morries, W. 1966. The Grollier Interantional Dictionary. Danbur:. The Gloiler Inc.

Nurgiantoro, Burhan. 1995. Penilaian Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Edisi II.

Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Nurhadi. 1987. Bahasa dan Sastra. Malang: Kapita Selekta. YA-3

Oller, John W. 1979. Language Testing at School. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Paiman. 1997. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Purwanto, Ngalim. 1985. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Remaja Karya.

Richard, Jack C. and Theodore S. Rodgers. 1986. Approach and Method in Language Teaching.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rahman. 2006. The Effectiveness of Community Language Learning (CLL) Through Group

Work. Mataram IKIP. Thesis S-1. Unpublsihed.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2002. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grapindo Persada.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1985. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Sastra. Bandung: PT. Aksara.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1991. Metodologi Pengajaran Bahasa. Edisi I. Bandung: Penerbit

Angkasa.

Ur. Pehny. 1999. A Course in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cup.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58791/tadrs.v8i01.496

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index By

  

 

 

Contact Us :

Tarbiyah Darussalam : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan dan Keagamaan

Address: Jl. Tanjung Rema, Fakultas Tarbiyah IAI Darussalam Martapura

Kabupaten: Banjar

Provinsi: Kalimantan Selatan

Telephone: 0812-3587-1313

Email: jurnaltarbiyah@iaidarussalam.ac.id